Please join us for our July 2025 General Meeting, on Tuesday, July 22, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., conducted via Microsoft Teams video conference.

Click here to join the meeting here.

Meeting ID: 223 268 016 951
Passcode: vZ9Nz7QG

DRAFT AGENDA (all times are approximate)

6:30 – 6:45 p.m.: Welcome and CAG Member Introductions

6:45 – 7:15 p.m.: EPA Updates and CAG Q&A / Public Comment and Q&A as time allows

7:15 – 7:45 p.m.: Turning Basin Design Presentation

7:45 – 8:30 p.m.: CAG Business and Committee Updates

  • Archaeology and Historic Preservation Committee
  • Land Use Committee
  • Outreach Committee
  • Water Quality/Technical Committee
  • Administrative Committee
  • Facilitation Committee

8:30 p.m.: Adjourn

Guests are always welcome to comment and ask questions using the chat function.

All Gowanus CAG meetings are open to the public, unless specifically noted otherwise.

Attendees: Steve Marcus (Facilitator), Erica Eliason, Mark Yarish, Katia Kelly, Joseph Alexiou, Linda Laviolette, Peter Reich, Alexandra Gregor, Susan Yung, Lisa Bowstead, Louis Kleinman

Guests: Aaron Kaufman, Irene Baker

Agenda

a) Discussed EPA and NYC Parks Department responses to the committee’s letter regarding the remediation of Thomas Greene Park and DD Pool.

Follow Up: Alexandra and Peter will be drafting a letter on behalf of Friends of Thomas Greene Park and will share a copy with the committee when it becomes available.

b) Discussed NYSDEC’s response to the committee’s request for additional  information regarding the former Citizens MGP Works site, Parcel #4, which is currently in the New York State Superfund program.

c) Discussed the recent announcement by NYSDEC of a 45-day comment period and an in-person meeting on July 29th regarding Parcel #3 of the former Citizens MGP Works site, aka 459 Smith Street (more info on the meeting here).

e) Discussed NYSDEC’s response for additional information regarding Parcels #1 and #2 of the former Citizens MGP Works site.

f) Request for an update on NYSDEC’s neighborhood Vapor Intrusion Study.

On behalf of the committee, Steve will be following up with Heidi Dudek on this request.

g) Discussed EPA’s Five-Year Review.

h) Discussed the recent findings that the Union and Nevins Streets TCE plume has expanded to 280 Nevins Street. 

On behalf of the committee, Steve will follow up with a request to do a thorough TCE plume study similar to the one that NYSDEC is currently doing near St. Mary Star of the Sea Church.

j) Irene Baker, who represents National Grid at our CAG meetings, was kind enough to follow up on the committee’s request for additional information regarding the former Citizens MGP Works site Parcel #4, and also look into when the Citizens Spring 2025 Arcadis Groundwater Monitoring report will be made available. The Fall 2024 report is available here.

For those of you who were not able to attend, here’s the link to the recording of the meeting: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Rmsz27TNQM_AW6JwJqUwMUIygQfeEReI?usp=sharing

Please note: The next Land Use Committee meeting is scheduled to be held Tuesday, August 5th, at 6:30pm.

Attendees

Joan Salome-Rodriguez, (Facilitator), Corinne Brenner (Gowanus Dredgers), Katia Kelly, Susan Yung, Celeste LeCompte, Mark Yarish

Guests: Panos Adonyadis (Gowanus Remediation Trust Engineering), Aaron Kaufman (GRT), David Himmelheber (GRT Engineering), Irene Baker (National Grid), Russell Hyatt (GRT Engineering, Geologists), Emily Bachman (Department of City Planning), Victoria Sacks (EPA), Brad Vogel (Gowanus Dredgers)

You can watch a recording of the meeting here. Enter passcode E!psg51D.

Presentation by Russell and Panos (has been the Senior Principal Engineer since 2013 and is leading the design team for 1st Street Turning Basin) regarding the draft design at Turning Basin 1 (near Power House). Addressed my personal issue: legal concept of “attractive nuisance” and why properties abutting the canal would be opposed to a soft entry to the turning basins. You don’t want to make it easy for kids to step into the brackish waters. Insurance becomes an issue. Attached the presentation below.

Also linking here to Victoria’s RTA 2 presentation though we did not discuss it.

Lively discussion followed as so much has changed since the 2019 draft plan. This plan has more wetland than the original plan. The presentation is attached to this email so I will not go into detail in these minutes as to what it looks like, but suffice it to say the team has revisited the entire concept in part in light of input from the Gowanus Canal Conservancy and Gowanus Dredgers and, it appears, because of the Gowanus rezoning. They now have a wetland shelf concept. They took rising water levels into account. We looked at the 2018 CAG resolution to see if this plan was consistent with it. I think that requires a bit more discussion. Panos says this design gives water access, marine access and wetland access, but Katia is concerned it gives less water as the EPA’s Record of Decision is very precise about how much water restoration the community is entitled to as an offset for the loss of canal water due to bulkheads. Per the ROD:

“The remedy will also include the excavation and restoration of approximately 475 feet of the filled-in former 1st Street turning basin.” 

Here is the link:

https://semspub.epa.gov/work/02/692106.pdf (page 81)

Gary was very pleased with this design because of the marsh. Corinne was curious to see info on the water surface area. Panos states the water area is 30 feet wide.  

I asked DCP what agency would own the turning basin. They did not know.

Read more »

Attendees

Joan Salome-Rodriguez (Facilitator), Katia Kelly, Louis Kleinman, Peter Reich.
Guests: Aaron Kaufman (Gowanus Remediation Team), Irene Baker (National Grid).

Agenda

  1. Discussed getting more material for Michael & Rachel’s Instagram account to get eyes on what we have: https://www.instagram.com/gowanus_archaeology/.
  2. Asked the committee for more material such as photos of old Gowanus that he can share.
  3. Discussed with Aaron Kaufman getting clearance for posting GRT material to the account. He responded 7/9/2025 that we have clearance and just need to send a notification when we post their material. 
  4. Discussed status of the Storyboard which is not yet finalized. Aaron will try to get an ETA on completion. He thinks a few months more. He will also confirm whether it can be used freely by this CAG group and/or on the Instagram. 
  5. I had wanted to reach out to Johnny Thornton (Arts Gowanus), Sasha (Proteus Gowanus), Andrea (GCC), Gowanus Dredgers, and Emily (also of Arts Gowanus) for a meeting in the fall for us to continue to conduct curated exhibition planning. Peter will follow up with Johnny Thornton to see what is going on in terms of opportunities for more exhibits, but right now there are QR-code walking tours posted about the Gowanus. He thinks Johnny would be interested in materials we could assemble for the walking tour. I asked for how-tos. We can put together photos of whatever we’d like added. Peter indicated he’d like to see 234 Butler Street added. Aiming for the fall because of summer doldrums and my upcoming surgery. Katia suggested maybe our committee could do the tour, but right now it is completely virtual. We asked Joseph if the photos in his book were open-source. He thinks yes. Also suggested the Brooklyn Eagle’s archive.  
  6. Also, we can use language “courtesy of …….”
  7. Joan will reach out to Brooklyn College Museum Studies Program and to Pratt’s archaeology team to see if there is any opportunity there in the fall. Surgery in August will delay Joan’s ability to chase these things down. Also will check with Union Street Library.
Read more »

CSO Tank Updates

RH-034 Tank

  • Drilling of micropiles below tank is ongoing and will continue through end of summer.
    • Purpose is to support the weight of the tank when full during CSO events and prevent upward force on the tank when it is empty.
  • Tank structure waterproofing and concrete forming / pouring expected to begin in early July and will continue through summer 2026.
  • Construction of new outfall structure at end of DeGraw Street is ongoing.

OH-007 Tank

  • New concrete sidewalks poured.
  • Construction of the new salt shed roof and walls and compost facility roof expected to complete in late July / early August.
  • Perimeter wall construction is ongoing, 98 of 138 panels completed (70+%), and will continue through September.
  • Permeation grouting of the completed panels down to the bedrock layer is under way.

DEP response to question regarding odors generated as a result of installing micropiles:

The drilling of micropiles generates little to no spoils. Any spoils that are generated are contained within the footprint of the CSO Tank excavation area. There is a very low potential for odors to be generated during the drilling operation but the project team continues to implement the odor control strategies that were successful in controlling odors during the mass excavation phase, including:

  • Remedial Odor Eliminator Concentrate: Applied directly at the source to neutralize odors.
  • Interior Misting Systems: Equipped with odor-neutralizing agents to mitigate airborne smells.

In addition, the ongoing monitoring efforts include:

  • Community and onsite odor walks: Regular inspections to assess and respond to odor conditions.
  • Community Air Monitoring Program (CAMP): Continuous sampling for PM10 and BTEX compounds.
  • Twice weekly SUMMA canister air sampling at 15 locations.

Five-Year Review

Read more »

Attendees

Joan Salome-Rodriguez, (Facilitator), Lisa Bowstead, Erica Eliason, Katia Kelly, Linda LaViolette, Mark Yarish, Susan Yung, Aaron Kaufman (Gowanus Remediation Team), Irene Baker (National Grid)

You can watch a recording of the meeting here. Enter passcode yc0e7%mF.

Riverkeeper and SWIM Coalition – sign on to letter re: wet weather designations.

Victoria Sacks (EPA Regional Project Manager) replied to our letter – any follow ups? The original letter with Victoria’s answers is below, followed by the questions we came up with at the meeting, which have been sent to Victoria and Heidi Dudek (NYS Department of Environmental Conservation).

Dear EPA and DEC representatives:

At a recent meeting, the members of the Gowanus CAG Water Quality Committee discussed a February 4, 2025 groundwater survey by HRP relating to a DEC Brownfield remediation at 473 President Street. (The site includes 469 President and 514 Union St).

The survey’s purpose was to identify the impacts from the President Street site’s chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) on off-site soil vapor and on groundwater.

The investigative work on the sites was performed from October 2022 to June 2024.  The report mentions that the three parcels are 12’ above sea level, and that the groundwater elevations range from .66 to 2.85’.  The groundwater flow is in a west-north westerly direction, towards the intersection of Union & Nevins and the Gowanus Canal, with minor fluctuations in levels based on tides.  

The elevations were mapped between January 2023 and June 2024. (see page 2, paragraph 3).  

The soil samplings referenced in the report were apparently not alarming. However, the groundwater samplings were (see pages 5-6).

In an effort to better understand how the many changes in the Gowanus area have affected groundwater flow in the area, the members of our committee would like to ask the following questions:

-where is this (potentially contaminated) groundwater going now that 70’ metal bulkheads have been installed in the canal as part of the Superfund Remediation?

Victoria Sacks: Not all of the bulkheads that have been installed around the canal are sealed (i.e. watertight) and not all of the bulkheads are as deep as 70 feet. The bulkhead designs are individual engineering decisions based on contamination in the upland and land stability for the canal remedy implementation. In addition, the cap is designed such that groundwater can move upwards through the cap, trapping any NAPL and chemical contamination below.

Follow-up question: Where is the NAPL and chemical contamination going?

Read more »

Attendees

Joan Salome-Rodriguez (Facilitator), Joseph Alexiou, Katia Kelly, Michael Killian, Louis Kleinman, Peter Reich.
Guests: Aaron Kaufman (Gowanus Remediation Team), Irene Baker (National Grid).

Michael and Rachel started an Instagram account to get eyes on what we have. It is up and running at https://www.instagram.com/gowanus_archaeology/. Please follow!

Michael needs more material. Joan will send him the photos she and Mary used for the exhibit. Aaron will get the clearance for posting GRT material to the account. Joan and others will look for old Gowanus photos we have and share with Michael so he can post to the account, too.  

The storyboard is not yet finalized. Aaron to get an ETA on completion and will ask if it can be used freely by this CAG group and/or on the Instagram. (Just a note, we may want to save it for events – I did not bring this up at the meeting).

Our joint endeavor with Johnny Thornton (Arts Gowanus), Sasha (Proteus Gowanus), Andrea (GCC), and Emily (also of Arts Gowanus) went over great.  Lots of interest and foot traffic.

Continue to conduct curated exhibition planning.  Peter will follow up with Johnny Thornton to see what is going on in terms of opportunities for more exhibits.

We still need to formulate a strategic business plan. Getting an exhibit together is not really enough and we don’t have expertise. Joan will reach out to Brooklyn College Museum Studies Program and to Pratt’s archaeology team to see if there is any opportunity there. Maybe also the reopening of the Union Street Library on Clinton Street.

Aaron clarified what items are actually artifacts and which are not based on GRT’s definitions, as follows.

Objects of Local Interest are defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

  • Identifiable by type, function, material and/or time period.
  • Has a general association with the area, but not with a specific site, event, or person along the Gowanus Canal during the canal’s period of significance (1853 to 1965).
  • Does not confirm previously unconfirmed archival information along the canal or reveal new facts that change our understanding of the history of the area. 

Artifacts are defined as meeting all of the following criteria: 

  • Identifiable by type, function, material and time period.
  • Has an identifiable association with a specific building, site, event, or person along the Gowanus Canal during the canal’s period of significance (1853 to 1965).
  • Confirms previously unconfirmed archival information along the canal or reveals new information that changes our understanding of the history/development of the area.

Debris is defined as any other item recovered from excavation/dredging, including:

  • Unidentifiable objects
  • Objects with no apparent association with the local area
  • Construction debris
  • Objects made after 1965
  • Natural items (such as trees, brush, rocks, etc.)

Attendees

Erica Eliason, Louis Kleinman, Susan Yung, Andrea Parker, Katia Kelly, Celeste LeCompte, Eymund Diegel, Corinne Brenner, Em Ruby, Mike Dulong, Aaron Kaufman (Trust), Irene Baker (National Grid), Gary Francis

1) Finalized email regarding groundwater survey conducted by HRP with questions to EPA and DEC representatives related to Brownfield remediation. The Water Quality Committee seeks clarification on how changes in the area affect groundwater flow and containment.

2) Discussed notice of proposed rulemaking to reclassify Gowanus canal from Class SD to Class SC, swimmable and fishable, with input from Em Ruby and Mike Dulong of Riverkeeper. Public comments are due by 11:59 p.m. on June 26, 2025.

Em discussed the Harlem River Use Attainability Analysis (UAA). Harlem River has been proposed to be reclassified to Class SB with a wet weather designation, which means it is safe for primary contact except during and after wet weather. This is a new classification for New York waters.

There are concerns in the UAA – the city is saying that Harlem River is currently meeting standards for SB with a wet weather designation after daylighting project is in place, so the city is arguing that it won’t have to do any more CSO reduction. However, Harlem River gets  as much as 2 billion gallons of CSO annually, which is the most CSO of any river in the state. There are concerns that the city won’t do more sewage capture with this designation and can use this to justify the current amount of CSO.

There’s no process for UAA to be reviewed regularly. Riverkeeper has an action alert. This UAA will inform the city’s reclassification of the other waterways, so this could have potential implications for the Gowanus Canal. The city is arguing that they don’t have the financial capability to get the Harlem River to Class SB without the wet weather designation.

Read more »

Attendees

Joan Salome-Rodriguez (Facilitator), Erica Eliason, Katia Kelly, Louis Kleinman, Margaret Maugenest, Susan Yung, Aaron Kaufman (Gowanus Remediation Team)

1:  Joan reported that US Geological Survey is doing a survey on behalf of the NYC Department of Environmental Protection – Michael Como responded. The USGS is looking at Gowanus but, disappointingly, is still only looking at the Federal Monitoring Well on Sterling Place and 6th Avenue. We need them to come down to at least Nevins between Sackett and Union there may be City water caps there). Joan will continue to follow up.  

2:  Erica will email the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation about its water quality rules. Nothing yet.

3.  We need to keep checking for a Notice of Proposed Rule Making with the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS), by March 31, 2025. It is DEC’s goal to file a Notice of Adoption with the NYSDOS by September 30, 2025. This rulemaking(s) may require a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small Businesses and Local Governments. Both Erica and I checked the website and did not see anything that appeared to be relevant to this. We will follow.  

4.  Follow ups for our many questions about the Whole Foods site:

Victoria Sacks (EPA Remedial Project Manager) emailed answers to our follow-up questions.  Only those for which we have yet to get full answers are listed here with our new questions.  Question 1 ultimately required we follow up with DEC.

Read more »