Attendees, CAG Members: Joan Salome-Rodriguez (Moderator), Linda LaViolette, Mark Yarish, Katia Kelly, Erica Eliason, Susan Yung, Emily Mitchell, Margaret Maugenest, Jason Schwartzman
Guests: Irene Baker – National Grid. Sean Downey – GRT. Nick Bello – Park Slope Living.
You can view a video recording of the meeting here. Enter passcode Hm%H$n9k for access.
Early discussion was not on the agenda but covered information about the CSO tanks – are they big enough, can there possibly be a third tank (maybe at Public Place if it were to be part of the state Superfund Program and not otherwise developed).
- This discussion led to a brief discussion of that which had been item two on the agenda – Sewershed in Gowanus. Would like to have a discussion at our meeting. I think there are issues related to the Atlantic Yards Project and the BMT project. Our infrastructure cannot possibly take all that. DEFERRED until next meeting.
- Finally went over Natalie’s Q&A’s that affect Water Quality. We discussed all of them and the action items are as follows:
A. What is the objective for the level of clean water once the canal is cleaned?
Implementation of the remedy will improve the surface water quality of the Canal by controlling and substantially eliminating sheens and preventing contact of the surface water with the contaminated sediment.
What about CSO’s? Corinne was following to draft an inquiry on this issue.
NOTE: We may have wanted to direct this to EPA initially and probably still should but we should send to DEC and definitely DEP as well since Lisa Garcia, the former head of EPA’s Region 2, is now the Commissioner at DEP. We know the current objective per DEC is SC but the question remains – what about the CSOs? We know that even with the tanks, there will still be CSOs in the water. What will happen to those? Will the City have to re-dredge?
B. What are the EPA’s water quality ARARs (actual measures that must be met for the water quality) for the Gowanus Canal? EPA and New York State have promulgated surface water standards which are enforceable standards for various surface water contaminants – EPA’s water quality standards (40 CFR 131) and New York State surface water quality standards (6 NYCRR Part 703). DEC has the primary responsibility for implementing the Clean Water Act.
I combined the above question with the next one.
EPA made it clear at the outset of the Superfund program that a goal was to have no recontamination after the cleanup. Based on the failure of the City to build the CSO tanks, contamination will be going into the canal AFTER the cleanup. How will EPA conduct oversight to ensure that the City will RE-CLEAN the canal or will EPA be doing that? The ROD states “in the event that the permanent measures are not implemented in a timely manner, interim controls, such as temporary solids capture and removal, [would] be implemented to mitigate sediment from the CSO discharges until the permanent measures have been implemented.” These controls were not feasible. The City will be required to perform maintenance dredging if CSO solids build up and exceed the PRGs. This is enforceable under the CSO remedial action Unilateral Administrative Order.
Won’t City re-dredging potentially damage the cap? General CAG Q. MARK’s Q. DEC, DOH, DOHMH, DEP.
Can there be kits for residents/businesses to check basement flood waters for contamination? Can there be monitors along the Canal such as were utilized in France along the Seine for the Olympics? Mark Yarish will draft an inquiry on these two related questions.
Read more »